Reuse of Carlton reject water: I. Effects on bermudagrass yield

Citation
Gj. Ruple et al., Reuse of Carlton reject water: I. Effects on bermudagrass yield, SOIL CROP, 58, 1999, pp. 31-38
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
SOIL AND CROP SCIENCE SOCIETY OF FLORIDA PROCEEDINGS
ISSN journal
00964522 → ACNP
Volume
58
Year of publication
1999
Pages
31 - 38
Database
ISI
SICI code
0096-4522(1999)58:<31:ROCRWI>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Sarasota County, FL is contracted to provide wastewater (sewage) effluent f or the irrigation of local golf courses. However, the county produces less wastewater effluent during summer months, and occasionally fails to meet it s obligation to the golf courses. A water treatment process known as electr odialysis reversal (EDR) is employed in the Carlton facility of Sarasota Co unty to create drinking water from groundwater sources that are non-potable due to high salt content. This process makes use of an antiscalant, Aquafe ed 600, to prevent precipitation of calcium solids that clog the membranes. The end products of EDR are desalinized, potable water and a saline reject water (TDS = 6500 mg L-1; EC = 5.9 dS m(-1)). This study was conducted to determine the feasibility of using EDR reject water to supplement the tradi tional wastewater effluent for turfgrass irrigation and to assess the effec t of reject water on bermudagrass growth. The study (1996-98) consisted of Tifway and FLoraTeX(R) bermudagrass grown in soil columns, irrigated with f our mixtures of reject:effluent (0:1, 1:2, 2:1, and 1:0) and maintained at two leaching fractions (0.15 and 0.30). Perennial ryegrass, a cool season t urfgrass, was overseeded during the winter months (December-February) of ye ars 1 and 2. Yield data for the first two years indicated no significant re duction in bermudagrass yield at either leaching fraction, regardless of th e proportion of reject water in the irrigation water. In the third year, ho wever, Tifway bermudagrass yields for the 1:0 and the 2:1 reject:effluent t reatments at 0.15 leaching fraction were significantly less than for the 0: 1 and the 1:2 reject:effluent treatments. There was no significant differen ce in the yield of FLoraTeX(R) bermudagrass, suggesting greater salt tolera nce than for the Tifway bermudagrass. Reduction in perennial ryegrass yield with application of reject water (in all proportions) indicated potential problems if using reject water during winter overseeding with ryegrass or s imilar, less salt-tolerant, turfgrass species.