O. Alaouiismaili et al., ODOR HEDONICS - CONNECTION WITH EMOTIONAL RESPONSE ESTIMATED BY AUTONOMIC PARAMETERS, Chemical senses, 22(3), 1997, pp. 237-248
The aim of this paper is to analyse the relationship between self-repo
rt hedonic evaluations and the physiological expression of emotion in
response to odorants. We try to solve the following questions: (1) Is
it possible to find any experimental evidence that the sense of smell
is linked with emotion? (2) What kind of odorants can be distinguished
by autonomic analysis? (3) Is there a link between hedonics and auton
omic information? The effects of odorants on the emotional process wer
e estimated, in terms of autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity. Fift
een subjects inhaled five odorants as olfactory stimuli: lavender (LAV
), ethyl acetoacetate (EAA), camphor (CAM), acetic acid (AA) and butyr
ic acid (BA). After inhaling the odorant, subjects were requested to f
ill out an 11-point hedonic scale to rate its pleasantness versus unpl
easantness. ANS parameters were as follows: two electrodermal response
s, skin potential (SP) and resistance (SR); two thermovascular paramet
ers, skin blood flow (SBF) and skin temperature (ST); and two cardiore
spiratory parameters: instantaneous respiratory frequency (IRF) and in
stantaneous heart rate (IHR). Simultaneous recording of six parameters
showed that specific autonomic patterns were associated with each odo
rant. An analysis of variance made it possible to differentiate among
the five odorants. Two-by-two odorant comparisons for autonomic respon
ses using Tukey's HSD multiple comparison test only permitted differen
tiation between pleasant odorants (LAV and EAA) and unpleasant (AA and
BA) ones, but camphor was differentiated from both pleasant and unple
asant odorants. Each odorant elicited responses in the different param
eters, yet subjects responded through their preferential channels; an
average of two channels was used by each subject. These results when c
ompared with those obtained with other senses (visual and auditory), d
id not evidence the postulated preferential link between olfaction and
emotion. A strong link between hedonics and ANS response could be dem
onstrated when considering each subject and mainly through his/her pre
ferential channel(s); conversely a weak correlation (SR duration excep
ted) was obtained between inter-subjects' hedonic evaluation. It seems
that for a given population the autonomic response reflect the odor v
alence only through some parameters related to the main preferential c
hannel(s) and thus the global autonomic pattern has to be considered.