Annualized rates of cognitive change in Alzheimer's disease (AD), an import
ant index of disease progression, show marked variability. To determine fac
tors leading to such variability, we computed rates of change in a cohort o
f patients with AD tested annually with the Mini Mental State Examination (
MMSE) and the more detailed Dementia Rating Scale (DRS). Estimates of rates
of change (slopes) and intercepts were calculated using least squares and
best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs). Potential predictors of rates of c
hange were examined using multivariate linear regression analysis. We found
that the MMSE had more noise than the DRS. For the MMSE, slopes showed a m
oderate floor effect and a slight ceiling, depending on initial MMSE scores
. These effects were less prominent for the DRS, for which slopes increased
as intercepts decreased. In analyses of predictors of change, the MMSE was
less useful than the DRS. In multiple linear regression models using DRS d
ata, predictors showed statistically stronger effects and explained a great
er extent of variation of slopes than did similar models using MMSE data. F
or example, among patients who died and underwent brain examination at auto
psy, neuropathology of Lewy bodies plus AD (Lewy Body variant; LBV) was ass
ociated with significantly faster rates of cognitive decline compared to pu
re AD in analyses that used the DRS, but only trends were identified with t
he MMSE. The metric properties and longitudinal characteristics of cognitiv
e tests and the statistical methods used to calculate change are key factor
s in obtaining reliable estimates of change in studying cohorts of patients
with AD. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.