The concepts that require validation in terms of the subject of endocrine d
isruption are listed and discussed. The main mechanisms by which endocrine
disruption can occur are identified, and the assays required for the detect
ion of adverse endocrine disruption toxicities associated with these mechan
isms are discussed. The process of assay validation is considered. The vali
dation of structure-activity relationships, the need for reference chemical
s. and the problems recently encountered when attempting to reproduce endoc
rine disruption data are also explored. The most important conclusions deri
ved from this analysis are that given the immature state of research into e
ndocrine disruption toxicity, testing strategies and the types of assay emp
loyed should be kept under constant review; inevitably researchers need to
accept the fact that future revision of each assay will he required. Second
. given the current absence of any chemical that is universally accepted to
he devoid of endocrine toxicity, assay specificity will be difficult to as
sess, and that imposes the need for alternative objective criteria for asse
ssing the value of individual assays.