Over the last several years, information has been accumulating that suggest
s that adverse effects are being induced in certain wildlife species. and p
erhaps also in humans, as a consequence of exposure to man-made chemicals t
hat have been released into the environment. Many of these effects have bee
n attributed to interactions with various hormone systems in endocrine tiss
ues. Most often the effects observed have been effects on reproduction and
development, although there an also (often conflicting) data regarding an a
ssociation between exposure and certain kinds of cancer, particularly cance
rs of reproductive tissues such as breast and testis: effects on the immune
system have also been noted. The substances To which these attributes have
been ascribed have come to be known as "endocrine modulators" or "endocrin
e disrupters." The full nature and scope of the "prohlem" of endocrine modu
lators/disruptors is currently a matter of great debate, both within and ou
tside of the scientific community. Regulatory authorities around the world
are being asked what their position is on this issue and what, if any, regu
latory strategies they are developing to address the: problem. In many case
s, because of the nature of the legislation under which governments manage
chemicals, regulatory decisions must be informed by risk assessment. This p
resentation will describe the general approach to the risk assessment of en
docrine modulators/disruptors as practiced by the US government, with parti
cular focus on the current practices/policies of the US Environmental Prote
ction Agency.