Je. Ramirez et al., GENITAL HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTIONS - KNOWLEDGE, PERCEPTION OF RISK, AND ACTUAL RISK IN A NONCLINIC POPULATION OF YOUNG-WOMEN, Journal of women's health, 6(1), 1997, pp. 113-121
The purpose of this study was to assess knowledge, beliefs, and attitu
des about genital human papillomavirus (HPV) infections in a group of
young women in a nonclinic setting and to examine the association betw
een perception of risk and actual risk. One hundred ten women attendin
g a state university participated in the study and were asked to compl
ete a self-administered questionnaire about knowledge and perceptions
of risk. They were then offered testing for the virus using a self-adm
inistered vaginal method. The mean age was 20 +/- 1.2 years. Ninety (8
2%) were sexually experienced (SE), with a mean number of lifetime par
tners of 5.1 +/- 4.3. The mean knowledge score was less than the 68th
percentile, reflecting low levels of knowledge about genital HPV infec
tions. The SE group had a higher knowledge score than the sexually ine
xperienced (p < .02), but there were no differences in knowledge betwe
en those who chose to be tested and those who refused testing. The maj
ority of women attributed negative emotion to being hypothetically tes
ted positive for HPV. Emotions selected by >50% of the group included
feeling scared, angry, guilty, anxious, confused, dirty, regretful, an
d panicky. A greater negative emotion score was associated with refusi
ng HPV testing (p < .002). Of the SE women, 58% (51) perceived themsel
ves at risk, and, of this group, 71% (36) agreed to be tested. Of the
women who agreed to HPV testing, 36% who perceived themselves at risk
and 35% who did not perceive themselves at risk were, in fact, positiv
e for HPV (p = ns). The majority of women have little knowledge of HPV
infections and have attributed many negative emotions associated with
infectivity. These negative attributes appear to influence women's de
cision making concerning HPV testing. The risk of HPV infection in thi
s nonclinic group was substantial, suggesting that even in a nonclinic
group, the prevalence of HPV is quite high. Perception of risk was un
related to actual risk (HPV positive test), reflecting the lack of sel
f-identified risk.