Pj. Pinter et al., Free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE): blower effects on wheat canopy microclimate and plant development, AGR FOR MET, 103(4), 2000, pp. 319-333
Free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) provides a realistic, cost-effect
ive method for evaluating the effects of supra-ambient CO2 concentrations o
n growth, development, yield, and water use of agricultural crops and natur
al ecosystems with very few of the problems normally associated with glassh
ouse or chamber type research. There are no walls interfering with incident
radiation and no artificial constraints on rooting depth. With current FAC
E technology, CO2 enriched air is injected around the perimeter of circular
plots and natural wind disperses the CO2 across the experimental area. Und
er stable, night-time wind conditions found in FACE wheat experiments at Ma
ricopa, Arizona, the blowers used to inject CO2 exerted subtle effects on t
he microclimate in a manner analogous to wind machines used for orchard fro
st protection. Plots equipped with blowers had nighttime foliage and air te
mperatures that averaged 0.6-1.0 degrees C warmer than controls without blo
wers. A secondary effect of these elevated temperatures was that plots equi
pped with blowers displayed differences in dew duration (time that leaves w
ere wet was reduced 30%), plant development (anthesis occurred 4 days earli
er), and senescence [as measured with the normalized difference vegetation
index (NDVI)]. Natural wind and turbulence appear to overcome the blower ef
fect during daytime treatments and on some nights. Aerial thermal imagery (
8-12 mu m) acquired during the 1998 FACE experiment with grain sorghum prov
ided additional evidence of the blower effect on canopy temperatures. Since
increased plant tissue temperatures also occur when elevated CO2 induces p
artial stomatal closure and reduces transpiration, not all instances of can
opy temperature elevation in CO2 enriched plots can be ascribed solely to t
he presence of blowers. It is concluded that proper controls for FACE facil
ities should have similar air hows to those used in the FACE plots. Advanta
ges and disadvantages to nighttime CO2 enrichment are discussed. (C) 2000 E
lsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.