Independent measurements of the major energy balance flux components are no
t often consistent with the principle of conservation of energy. This is re
ferred to as a lack of closure of the surface energy balance. Most results
in the literature have shown the sum of sensible and latent heat fluxes mea
sured by eddy covariance to be less than the difference between net radiati
on and soil heat fluxes. This under-measurement of sensible and latent heat
fluxes by eddy-covariance instruments has occurred in numerous field exper
iments and among many different manufacturers of instruments. Four eddy-cov
ariance systems consisting of the same models of instruments were set up si
de-by-side during the Southern Great Plains 1997 Hydrology Experiment and a
ll systems under-measured fluxes by similar amounts. One of these eddy-cova
riance systems was collocated with three other types of eddy-covariance sys
tems at different sites; all of these systems under-measured the sensible a
nd latent-heat fluxes. The net radiometers and soil heat flux plates used i
n conjunction with the eddy-covariance systems were calibrated independentl
y and measurements of net radiation and soil heat flux showed little scatte
r for various sites. The 10% absolute uncertainty in available energy measu
rements was considerably smaller than the systematic closure problem in the
surface energy budget, which varied from 10 to 30%. When available-energy
measurement errors are known and modest, eddy-covariance measurements of se
nsible and latent heat fluxes should be adjusted for closure. Although the
preferred method of energy balance closure is to maintain the Bowen-ratio,
the method for obtaining closure appears to be less important than assuring
that eddy-covariance measurements are consistent with conservation of ener
gy. Based on numerous measurements over a sorghum canopy, carbon dioxide fl
uxes, which are measured by eddy covariance, are underestimated by the same
factor as eddy covariance evaporation measurements when energy balance clo
sure is not achieved. Published by Elsevier Science B.V.