OUTPATIENT GERIATRIC EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT - IS THERE AN INVESTMENT EFFECT

Citation
Rw. Toseland et al., OUTPATIENT GERIATRIC EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT - IS THERE AN INVESTMENT EFFECT, The Gerontologist, 37(3), 1997, pp. 324-332
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Geiatric & Gerontology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00169013
Volume
37
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
324 - 332
Database
ISI
SICI code
0016-9013(1997)37:3<324:OGEAM->2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
The effectiveness and efficiency of outpatient geriatric evaluation an d management (GEM) was compared to usual outpatient primary care (UPC) . Although GEM had nea overall impact on health care utilization or co st of care for the entire study period, significant reductions were fo und during the sixteen- to twenty-four-month study period, suggesting a possible investment effect, In the first eight months of the study, GEM patients incurred 34.8% more in health care costs than UPC patient s, hut in the final eight months of the study the cost of care far UPC patients exceeded that for CEM patients by 37.8%.