OBJECTIVE: Parenteral nutrition sustains life in patients with intestinal f
ailure. However, some experience life-threatening complications from parent
eral nutrition, and in these individuals intestinal transplantation may be
Lifesaving.
METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 28 consecutive isolated small bo
wel transplants performed in eight adults and 20 children between December
1993 and June 1998 at the University of Nebraska Medical Center.
RESULTS: The I-yr patient and graft survivals were 93% and 71%, respectivel
y. The causes of graft loss were hyperacute rejection (n = 1), acute reject
ion (n = 5), vascular thrombosis (n = 1). and patient death (n = 1). The me
dian length of time required until full enteral nutrition was 27 days. All
28 patients have experienced acute rejection of their small bowel grafts an
d rejection led to graft failure in five. Jaundice and/or hepatic fibrosis
was present preoperatively in 17 of the 28 recipients and hyperbilirubinemi
a was completely reversed in all patients with functional grafts within 4 m
onths of transplantation. Three patients developed posttransplant lymphopro
liferative disease (11%). Three recipients developed cytomegalovirus enteri
tis and all were successfully treated.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient survival after intestinal transplantation is comparabl
e to parenteral nutrition for patients with intestinal failure. Better immu
nosuppressive regimens are needed to decrease the risk of graft loss from a
cute rejection. The incidence of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorde
r is higher after intestinal transplantation than after other solid organ t
ransplants and the risk of cytomegalovirus enteritis is low with the use of
cytomegalovirus seronegative donors. Liver dysfunction in the absence of e
stablished cirrhosis can be reversed. (Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95: 1506-151
5. (C) 2000 by Am. Cell. of Gastroenterology).