Abundance and subcellular distribution of MCT1 and MCT4 in heart and fast-twitch skeletal muscles

Citation
A. Bonen et al., Abundance and subcellular distribution of MCT1 and MCT4 in heart and fast-twitch skeletal muscles, AM J P-ENDO, 278(6), 2000, pp. E1067-E1077
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM
ISSN journal
01931849 → ACNP
Volume
278
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
E1067 - E1077
Database
ISI
SICI code
0193-1849(200006)278:6<E1067:AASDOM>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
The expression of two monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs) was examined in m uscle and heart. MCT1 and MCT4 proteins are coexpressed in rat skeletal mus cles, but only MCT1 is expressed in rat hearts. Among six rat fast-twitch m uscles (red and white gastrocnemius, plantaris, extensor digitorum longus, red and white tibialis anterior) there was an inverse relationship between MCT1 and MCT4 (r = -0.94). MCT1 protein was correlated with MCT1 mRNA (r = 0.94). There was no relationship between MCT4 mRNA and MCT4 protein. MCT1 ( r = -0.97) and MCT4 (r = 0.88) protein contents were correlated with percen t fast-twitch glycolytic fiber. When normalized for their mRNAs, MCT1 but n ot MCT4 was still correlated with the percent fast-twitch glycolytic fiber composition of rat muscles (r = -0.98). MCT1 and MCT4 were also measured in plasma membranes (PM), triads (TR), T tubules (TT), sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR), and intracellular membranes (IM). There was an intracellular pool of MCT4 but not of MCT1. The MCT1 subcellular distribution was as follows: PM (100%) > TR (31.6%) > SR (15%) = TT (14%) > IM (1.7%). The MCT4 subcellula r distribution was considerably different [PM (100%) > TR (66.5%) > (36%) = SR (43%) > IM (24%)]. These studies have shown that 1) the mechanisms regu lating the expression of MCT1 (transcriptional and posttranscriptional) and MCT4 (posttranscriptional) are different and 2) differences in MCT1 and MC T4 expression among muscles, as well as in their subcellular locations, sug gest that they may have different roles in muscle.