OBJECTIVE: To analyze cellular proliferative activity, MIB-1 immunopositivi
ty of normal tissue (n = 20), follicular adenoma (n=30) and follicular carc
inoma (n = 32) of the thyroid gland was analyzed by means of immunohistomet
ry.
STUDY DESIGN: Immunohistochemical reactions were performed on 3-mu m sectio
ns from routinely formalin fixed and paraffin embedded surgical specimens u
sing an indirect peroxidase method. The rate of immunostained cells was det
ermined using the CM-2 TV image analysis system (Hund, Wetzlar, Federal Rep
ublic of Germany). Forty viewing fields (1.94 mm(2)) were measured with 20:
1 objective magnification. An average of 5,965 cells were assessed in each
case.
RESULTS: Mean MIB-1 immunopositivity was higher in follicular carcinoma (av
erage, 2.30%) and follicular adenoma (0.58%) than in normal thyroid tissue
(0.14%). The distribution of single values differed significantly be tween
groups (P <.001). To test the suitability of MIB-1 immunohistometry for the
differential diagnosis of follicular adenoma and follicular carcinoma, dif
ferent four-field tables with varying thresholds were calculated. Using a t
hreshold of 0.9%,follicular carcinoma could be detected with a sensitivity
of 75% (24/32) and a specificity of 83% (25/30). If a specificity of 90% is
required (27/30), the sensitivity of the test decreases to 69% (22/32), ba
sed on a threshold of 1.1%.
CONCLUSION: As some overlap of single values has to be considered MIB-1 imm
unohistometry, although presenting new insights into the proliferative pote
ntial of thyroid lesions, is of only limited value for the differential dia
gnosis of follicular lesions in routine surgical pathology.