Objectives-To compare three therapeutic strategies using slow acting antirh
eumatic drugs (SAARDs) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), for their diseas
e modifying properties, toxicity, and lag time until treatment effect.
Methods-Patients with recent onset RA from six hospitals were randomly assi
gned to immediate initiation of one of three treatment strategies: (I) a "m
ild SAARD with a long lag time" (hydroxychloroquine, if necessary replaced
by auranofin); (II) a "potent SAARD with a long lag time" (intramuscular go
ld, if necessary replaced by D-penicillamine); (III) a "potent SAARD with a
short lag time" (methotrexate, if necessary replaced by sulfasalazine). Co
mparisons included two years of follow up.
Results-All SAARD strategies reduced mean disease activity. A greater perce
ntage of patients improved clinically with strategies II and III than with
strategy I: percentages of patients improved on joint score with strategies
II and III (79% and 82%, respectively), which was statistically different
from strategy I (66%). The same was true for remission percentages: 31% and
24% v 16%, respectively). Longitudinal analysis showed significantly less
disability with strategy III, and a lower erythrocyte sedimentation rate wi
th strategy II than with strategy I. In addition, radiological damage after
one and two years, was significantly lower in strategies II and III (at tw
o years median scores were 11 and 10 v 14 in strategy I, p<0.05). Toxicity
was increased in strategy II compared with the other strategies.
Conclusion-Strategy III, comprising methotrexate or sulfasalazine, produced
the best results weighing effectiveness and toxicity. Strategy I (hydroxyc
hloroquine or auranofin) was slightly less effective, and strategy II (intr
amuscular gold or D-penicillamine) was associated with increased toxicity.