Background. Intrinsic abnormality of the aortic wall may explain the associ
ation of bicuspid aortic valves with ascending aortic aneurysms. Separate v
alve and graft repair of such lesions, rather than composite Valve graft re
placement, is more straightforward but leaves potentially abnormal sinuses
behind.
Methods. Between January 1985 and January 1998, 45 patients underwent separ
ate valve and graft (n = 27) or composite valve graft (n = 18) for an ascen
ding aortic aneurysm and bicuspid aortic valve. Perioperative events and la
te results were compared.
Results. Patients undergoing separate valve and graft were older (mean age,
60 a 13 vs 42 +/- 12 years, p < 0.001) and were more likely to have purely
stenotic (48% vs 6%, p = 0.003) than purely regurgitant (11% vs 72%, p < 0
.001) disease. They were also more likely to require concomitant coronary a
rtery bypass grafting (56% vs 6%, p = 0.001). There were no significant dif
ferences in operative risk and no known late complications related to recur
rent aneurysms.
Conclusions. Root replacement with a composite valve graft can be accomplis
hed with low operative risk and is the first choice for repair of this lesi
on. Separate valve and graft repair, however, yields satisfactory early and
late results and remains an acceptable option, especially when the coronar
y ostea are not displaced or when concomitant procedures must be performed.
(C) 2000 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.