Kd. Shearer, Experimental design, statistical analysis and modelling of dietary nutrient requirement studies for fish: a critical review, AQUAC NUTR, 6(2), 2000, pp. 91-102
A limited survey of published reports on dietary nutrient requirement estim
ates for fish (three journals, 46 papers) indicates that broken-line analys
is and analysis of variance (ANOVA) are often used to estimate nutrient req
uirements from dose-response data. The application of regression models usi
ng published treatment mean values to re-evaluate estimates was possible us
ing 33 of these reports. Re-evaluation suggests that the broken-line method
and ANOVA frequently underestimate the requirement. Regression produced es
timates that averaged approximately twice, but were up to five times the pu
blished requirement. Additional problems that prevented re-evaluation or pr
oduced errors in the original estimates were: failure to include nutrient l
evels high enough to produce a maximum response, failure to space nutrient
input levels closely enough to adequately model the dose-response relations
hip, an apparent failure to screen data before analysis, and insufficient m
odel diagnosis. Examples from the literature are presented to illustrate ho
w design, method of analysis and the choice of model affect the requirement
estimate. The effects of measurement frequency and the experiment duration
on the resulting requirement estimate are discussed. A set of protocols is
presented to help improve nutrient requirement estimates.