Objective: This review draws on current knowledge of risk for youth suicide
to categorise strategies for intervention. Its goal is to identify areas o
f 'research need' and to provide an evidence base to identify 'best buy' pr
eventive interventions for youth suicide.
Method: The design, development, implementation and evaluation of preventio
n strategies ranging from clinical interventions to population-based univer
sal approaches are considered within five risk factor domains: individual,
family, community, school and peer.
Results: There is a paucity of evidence on the effects of interventions tar
geting depression and suicidal behaviour. Nevertheless, there are effective
indicated, selective and universal interventions for important risk factor
s for depression and suicidal behaviour. Little evidence has emerged to sup
port the efficacy of some traditional approaches to suicide prevention, suc
h as school based suicide education programs and telephone hotlines.
Conclusions: Youth suicide prevention strategies in Australia have generall
y employed traditional approaches that focus on clinical interventions for
self-harmers, restricting access to lethal means, providing services to hig
h risk groups and enhancing general practitioner responses. Both program de
velopment and research evaluation of interventions for many important risk
and protective factors for suicide have been neglected.