Since the identification of the novel transforming gene neu in rat neurobla
stomas in 1981, and the subsequent cloning of the human equivalent HER-2, t
hen have been considerable developments concerning the role and value of HE
R-2 in human breast cancer. Early studies found gene amplification in 20-30
% of boast carcinomas, with most studies linking this to poorer survival. N
umerous antibodies have been generated against the oncoprotein and in many
instances overexpression, as defined by membrane staining of breast cancer
cells, correlated with gene amplification. Many studies, but not all, have
found an association between HER-2 reactivity and poor prognosis. HER-2 can
also be detected in high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ. HER-2 status can
also aid prediction of response to hormonal and chemotherapy, but the prese
nt interest lies in the humanized monoclonal antibody against HER-2 (Hercep
tin(R)) that has been developed. This is only of value if there is over-exp
ression of HER-2 by a breast cancer, and so a reliable, accurate method of
determination of HER-2 status is required. Immunohistochemistry is widely u
sed and is relatively simple, with no major equipment requirements. However
, there are variations in results with different antibodies and standardize
d methods, with controls for evaluating extent of reactivity required. Fluo
rescent in situ hybridization, which detects gene amplification, is an alte
rnative approach that can be used with fixed embedded tissue but the techni
que is less widely available. HER-2 is the first oncoprotein involved in br
east cancer in which there has been direct translation from the laboratory
to the patient. (C) 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.