Objective: The objective was to report on the possibility of allergic react
ion to the components of a spinal cord stimulator.
Design: We describe a severe allergic reaction after the insertion of a spi
nal cord stimulator in a patient with complex regional pain syndrome type 1
.
Setting: The patient was being followed in an office-based pain management
practice.
Patient: The patient is a 41-year-old woman with complex regional pain synd
rome type II posttrauma.
Intervention: Insertion of a cervical and lumbar spinal cord stimulator.
Outcome Measures: The outcome measures were a numerical scale of pain inten
sity and the ability to perform the activities of daily living.
Results: Adequate pain central complicated by allergic reaction.
Conclusions: There exists a possibility that a patient may experience an al
lergic reaction to spinal cord stimulator components. Recognition of such c
ontact sensitivity is important for physicians implanting such devices. Pat
ients may be misdiagnosed as having infections, which can delay appropriate
management; definitive diagnosis can be confirmed with a patch test. Treat
ment consists of removal of such devices.