In 1997, the American Society of Criminology received a request for a frien
d-of-the-court brief in support of an experimental evaluation of a court-ma
ndated counseling program for domestic offenders. The experiment was oppose
d by the prosecuting attorney in the jurisdiction where it was to take plac
e. In this article, it is argued that scholarly societies have an obligatio
n to uphold and promulgate the principle that random assignment to treatmen
t options is the best scientific method for determining the effectiveness o
f options such as those proposed in this case.