Efficacy of pantoprazole in the prevention of peptic ulcers, induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study
Gb. Porro et al., Efficacy of pantoprazole in the prevention of peptic ulcers, induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study, DIG LIVER D, 32(3), 2000, pp. 201-208
Aim. To evaluate the efficacy of pantoprazole in preventing gastrointestina
l lesions in patients with rheumatic diseases receiving continuous, long-te
rm treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
Material. This was a prospective, randomised, double-blind, unbalanced, pla
cebo-controlled, parallel group study. Outpatients (n = 104, age range 22-8
0 years, mean age 59.5) with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis, requir
ing chronic intake of NSAIDs (at least 8 weeks prior to the start of the st
udy), were randomised and enrolled to receive either 40 mg pantoprazole (n=
70) or placebo (n=34) once daily, for 12 weeks. Patients had endoscopically
confirmed gastric and duodenal lesions grade 0, 1 or 2 (Lanza classificati
on grade 0: normal to hyperaemic mucosa; grade 1 : 1 to 3 erosions, submuco
sal haemorrhage or petechiae, grade 2 : 4 to 10 erosions, submucosal haemor
rhages or petechiae). Clinical and endoscopic evaluations were performed at
baseline, after 4, and 12 weeks. The primary end-point of the study was th
e incidence of gastric or duodenal ulcers after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment
.
Results. Patients (n=95) were evaluated: 65 in the pantoprazole group and 3
0 in the placebo group. When considering all patients (those with Lanza sco
re grade 0, 1, 2 at baseline), the overall proportion of patients in remiss
ion was 82% and 77% after 4 weeks, and 72% and 59% after 12 weeks in pantop
razole and placebo groups, respectively (cumulative survival analysis accor
ding to Kaplan-Meier). The difference between the treatment groups was even
more marked when only those patients with normal mucose at baseline (grade
0) were considered. After 12 weeks, the proportion of patients in remissio
n was 82% (95% confidence limits 70% - 94%) in the pantoprazole and 55% (95
% confidence limits 33%-77%) in the placebo treatment group, p=0.036. Adver
se events were reported in 4% and 6% of patients in pantoprazole and placeb
o treatment groups, respectively
Conclusions. Pantoprazole 40 mg once daily was well tolerated and is more e
ffective than placebo in the prevention of peptic ulcers in patients with r
heumatic diseases who require continuous, long-term, treatment with NSAIDs.