Functional and quality-of-life outcomes in patients with rectal cancer after combined modality therapy, intraoperative radiation therapy, and sphincter preservation
D. Shibata et al., Functional and quality-of-life outcomes in patients with rectal cancer after combined modality therapy, intraoperative radiation therapy, and sphincter preservation, DIS COL REC, 43(6), 2000, pp. 752-758
PURPOSE: Locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancers treated with
external beam radiation therapy, intraoperative radiation therapy, and che
motherapy represent a complex group of patients in the setting of extensive
pelvic surgery and sphincter preservation. We sought to define functional
outcome and quality of life in this subset of patients. METHODS: We retrosp
ectively reviewed our experience with locally advanced primary and recurren
t rectal cancer patients who underwent intraoperative radiation therapy wit
h either low anterior resection (n = 12) or coloanal anastomosis (n = 6) be
tween 1991 and 1998. Current functional outcome and quality of life were ev
aluated by a detailed questionnaire. RESULTS: Median time from operation to
assessment was 24 (range, 6-93) months. Using a standardized Sphincter Fun
ction Scale, incorporating the number of bowel movements per day and degree
of incontinence, patients were graded as poor, fair, good, or excellent fu
nction. Of all patients, 56 percent reported unfavorable (poor or fair) fun
ction. Of the subset of patients with coloanal anastomosis or very low low
anterior resection, 88 percent had unfavorable function as compared with 30
percent with standard low anterior resection. (P = 0.02; Fisher's exact pr
obability test). A quality-of-life satisfaction score based on social, prof
essional, and recreational restrictions demonstrated 56 percent of patients
to be dissatisfied with their bowel function. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of
patients with advanced rectal cancers who require external beam radiation
therapy, extensive pelvic surgery, and intraoperative radiation therapy rep
ort unfavorable functional and quality-of-life outcomes after sphincter pre
servation. In this setting patients being considered for coloanal anastomos
is or very low anterior resection may be better served by permanent diversi
on.