PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of ket
orolac combined with local anesthetics for anorectal surgery. METHODS: From
June 1998 through March 1999, 123 outpatients undergoing anorectal surgery
were entered into a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study involvin
g three treatment groups. All patients received intravenous sedation consis
ting of fentanyl and a propofol infusion, with a local anesthesia mixture o
f lidocaine, bupivacaine, and bicarbonate. Group A (41 patients) received p
lacebo (saline) injections. Group B (41 patients) received 60 mg of intrave
nous ketorolac at the onset of the procedure, and Group C (41 patients) rec
eived 60 mg of ketorolac mixed with the local anesthetic. Data were analyze
d using analysis of variance and chi-squared tests. RESULTS: All groups had
similar demographic characteristics and operative procedures. Twenty-nine
of the 123 patients were human immunodeficiency virus-positive. There was n
o difference in operative or anesthesia time. Anesthesia and fluids given w
ere similar in across groups. A significantly higher percentage of Group A
patients had pain (34 percent) and required additional oral analgesia (20 p
ercent) in the Day Surgery Unit. Only 5 percent of Group B and Group C pati
ents complained of pain, with oral analgesics given to 2 percent of Group B
and none in Group C. Voiding difficulties were more common in Group A pati
ents, one patient requiring catheterization CONCLUSION: The addition of ket
orolac (60 mg), either intravenous or injected with local anesthetics, redu
ces voiding problems and significantly decreases postoperative analgesic re
quirements in outpatients undergoing anorectal surgery.