K. Roeleveld et al., MOTOR UNIT SIZE ESTIMATION - CONFRONTATION OF SURFACE EMG WITH MACRO EMG, ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 105(3), 1997, pp. 181-188
Surface EMG (SEMG) is little used for diagnostic purposes in clinical
neurophysiology, mainly because it provides little direct information
on individual motor units (MUs). One of the techniques to estimate the
MU size is intra-muscular Macro EMG. The present study compares SEMG
with Macro EMG. Fifty-eight channel SEMG was recorded simultaneously w
ith Macro EMG. Individual MUPs were obtained by single fiber triggered
averaging. All recordings were made from the biceps brachii of health
y subjects during voluntary contraction at low force. High positive co
rrelations were found between all Macro and Surface motor unit potenti
al (MUP) parameters: area, peak-to-peak amplitude, negative peak ampli
tude and positive peak amplitude. The MUPs recorded with SEMG were dep
endent on the distance between the MU and the skin surface. Normalizin
g the SEMG parameters for MU location did not improve the correlation
coefficient between the parameters of both techniques. The two measure
ment techniques had almost the same relative range in MUP parameters i
n any individual subject compared to the others, especially after norm
alizing the surface MUP parameters for MU location. MUPs recorded with
this type of SEMG provide useful information about the MU size. (C) 1
997 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.