The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has released a report entitled Con
dition of the Mid-Atlantic Estuaries. That report summarizes the findings o
f several studies conducted by federal and state agencies and academic inst
itutions in Chesapeake Bay, Delaware Estuary, and the coastal bays of Delaw
are, Maryland, and Virginia, and simultaneously addresses two distinct audi
ences: environmental managers and the general public. This paper documents
the process of preparing the Estuaries Report, emphasizing the lessons lear
ned in merging information from a wide-variety of sources and in reporting
the results to multiple audiences. The major difficulties in preparing the
report included: 1) choosing a format and topics that adequately addressed
both environmental managers and the public, 2) resolving spatial and tempor
al disparities in the assembled data sets, and 3) establishing threshold va
lues that distinguished between acceptable and unacceptable conditions in i
ndicators. Our solutions to these challenges and alternatives are discussed
. We conclude that a small team of knowledgeable scientists can effectively
merge the information of diverse sources into a document that is useful to
both environmental managers and the interested public. However, considerab
le interaction between the team and other scientists was necessary to resol
ve ambiguities and assure relevancy and accuracy. These findings support th
e proposition that the vast sources of existing environmental information c
an be easily and effectively used to assess the ecological condition across
large regions.