We derive a new Bayesian formulation for the discrete geophysical inverse p
roblem that can significantly reduce the cost of the computations. The Baye
sian approach focuses on obtaining a probability distribution (the posterio
r distribution), assimilating three kinds of information: physical theories
(data modelling), observations (data measurements) and prior information o
n models. Once this goal is achieved, all inferences can be obtained from t
he posterior by computing statistics relative to individual parameters (e.g
. marginal distributions), a daunting computational problem in high dimensi
ons.
Our formulation is developed from the working hypothesis that the local (su
bsurface) prior information on model parameters supercedes any additional i
nformation from other parts of the model. Based on this hypothesis, we prop
ose an approximation that permits a reduction of the dimensionality involve
d in the calculations via marginalization of the probability distributions.
The marginalization facilitates the tasks of incorporating diverse prior i
nformation and conducting inferences on individual parameters, because the
final result is a collection of 1-D posterior distributions. Parameters are
considered individually, one at a time. The approximation involves throwin
g away, at each step, cross-moment information of order higher than two, wh
ile preserving all marginal information about the parameter being estimated
. The main advantage of the method is allowing for systematic integration o
f prior information while maintaining practical feasibility. This is achiev
ed by combining (1) probability density estimation methods to derive margin
al prior distributions from available local information, and (2) the use of
multidimensional Gaussian distributions, which can be marginalized in clos
ed form.
Using a six-parameter problem, we illustrate how the proposed methodology w
orks. In the example, the marginal prior distributions are derived from the
application of the principle of maximum entropy, which allows one to solve
the entire problem analytically. Both random and modelling errors are cons
idered. The uncertainty measure for estimated parameters is provided by 95
per cent probability intervals calculated from the marginal posterior distr
ibutions.