Genotyping of Listeria monocytogenes: comparison of RAPD, ITS, and PFGE

Citation
A. Gravesen et al., Genotyping of Listeria monocytogenes: comparison of RAPD, ITS, and PFGE, INT J F MIC, 57(1-2), 2000, pp. 43-51
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Food Science/Nutrition
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
ISSN journal
01681605 → ACNP
Volume
57
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
43 - 51
Database
ISI
SICI code
0168-1605(20000610)57:1-2<43:GOLMCO>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Forty-eight strains of Listeria monocytogenes were genotyped by two rapid m ethods: random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and 16S to 23S rRNA internal transcribed spacer fragment length polymorphism (ITS), and compare d to the more time-consuming pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). The s trains originated primarily from either pigs, pork products, or pork produc t processing environments. With strict standardisation of procedures in two separate laboratories, we were able to obtain excellent inter- as well as intralaboratory RAPD typing reproducibility. RAPD typing employing two diff erent PCR primers divided the strains into 10 RAPD types (index of discrimi nation of 0.793). ITS typing employing primers designed for conserved eubac terial rRNA sequences gave only two ITS types. and was therefore not suited for genotyping of L. monocytogenes. PFGE typing by ApaI-restriction of chr omosomal DNA gave 15 PFGE types (index of discrimination of 0.910). Combina tion of RAPD and ITS typing gave an index of discrimination of 0.844. There was generally good agreement between the relatedness of strains and subgro ups indicated by the three methods. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All righ ts reserved.