Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare 3 different electrobright
ening techniques and 3 electrolytic solutions in their effects upon the fit
surface of cast cobalt-chromium frameworks. Materials and Methods: Fifty c
ast cobalt-chromium frameworks, which were subsequently divided into batche
s of 10, were prepared according to a standard protocol. Three electrobrigh
tening techniques were tested initially using a single brand of electrolyte
(Croform) and a batch of 10 frameworks per technique. The loss of metal by
weight was determined from the fit surface of each casting. The least corr
osive technique of these 3 was used again with 2 other brands of electrolyt
e (Nobilium and E501) in a repetition of the protocol. The fit surfaces of
8 random samples cut from each batch of electrobrightened castings were vie
wed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results: Statistical analysis ap
plying a one-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni's multiple comparison
of means test demonstrated that one immersion of the framework for 10 minut
es at 1 amp when used in conjunction with Nobilium electrolyte removed the
least metal (P = 0.001). The SEM study suggested that the Nobilium electrol
yte also produced the smoothest surface. Conclusion: Electrobrightening tec
hniques affect the amount of metal removed, and the electrolytic solution u
sed influences the resultant surface.