The issue of timing is addressed in a game between managerial firms. The ch
oice over timing can be taken either by managers or by entrepreneurs. It is
shown that (i) delegation drastically modifies the owners' preferences con
cerning the distribution of roles, as compared with the setting where firms
act as pure profit-maximizers; and (ii) the ability of moving first in the
market game entails that, at least observationally, the owner of the leadi
ng firm prefers not to delegate. I show that the choice of the timing by ma
nagers entails the same profit that owners would achieve by specifying the
timing in the delegation contract.