The paper analyses the determinants of cross-sectional stock returns at the
London Stock Exchange in the last 26 years. It finds that portfolio strate
gies based on low values of earning per share (EPS), market to book value (
MTBV), market Value (MV) and return on equity (ROE) significantly outperfor
m the index. Do size and value (S&V) strategy premia disappear when risk-ad
justed or do they reveal gains from trading against noise, near rational, l
iquidity or "weak-hearted" traders? We find that the significance of cross-
sectional determinants of these strategies is not absorbed by ex post betas
. They are not riskier in terms of monthly return standard deviations, cova
riation with GDP growth and their premia do not disappear when survivorship
bias is taken into account. Portfolio mean monthly returns (MMRs), regress
ed on several risk factors in 3-CAPM models, confirm that S&V strategy prem
ia persist when risk adjusted. Empirical results also mark the difference b
etween ROE and MTBV portfolios, on the one side, and MV and EPS portfolios,
on the other. Descriptive statistics on preformation and postformation ret
urns, average balance sheet values and preformation standard deviations cle
arly show that ROE and MTBV portfolios have a common financial distress fac
tor and are then more exposed to systematic risk. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science
B.V. All rights reserved.
JEL classification. G11.