Py. Groisman et al., The relationship of cloud cover to near-surface temperature and humidity: Comparison of GCM simulations with empirical data, J CLIMATE, 13(11), 2000, pp. 1858-1878
One of the possible ways to check the adequacy of the physical description
of meteorological elements in global climate models (GCMs) is to compare th
e statistical structure of these elements reproduced by models with empiric
al data from the world climate observational system. The success in GCM dev
elopment warranted a further step in this assessment. The description of th
e meteorological element in the model can be considered adequate if, with a
proper reproduction of the mean and variability of this element (as shown
by the observational system), the model properly reproduces the internal re
lationships between this element and other climatic variables (as observed
during the past several decades). Therefore, to distinguish more reliable m
odels, the authors suggest first analyzing these relationships, "the behavi
or of the climatic system," using observational data and then testing the G
CMs' output against this behavior.
In this paper, the authors calculated a set of statistics from synoptic dat
a of the past several decades and compared them with the outputs of seven G
CMs participating in the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP),
focusing on cloud cover, one of the major trouble spots for which parameter
izations are still not well established, and its interaction with other met
eorological fields. Differences between long-term mean values of surface ai
r temperature and atmospheric humidity for average and clear sky or for ave
rage and overcast conditions characterize the long-term noncausal associati
ons between these two elements and total cloud cover. Not all the GCMs repr
oduce these associations properly. For example, there was a general agreeme
nt in reproducing mean daily cloud-temperature associations in the cold sea
son among all models tested, but large discrepancies between empirical data
and some models are found for summer conditions. A correct reproduction of
the diurnal cycle of cloud-temperature associations in the warm season is
still a major challenge for two of the GCMs that were tested.