Relative judgment seems to be the key: Revisiting the beck effect

Citation
R. Kimchi et D. Navon, Relative judgment seems to be the key: Revisiting the beck effect, J EXP PSY P, 26(2), 2000, pp. 789-805
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE
ISSN journal
00961523 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
789 - 805
Database
ISI
SICI code
0096-1523(200004)26:2<789:RJSTBT>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
In multiple-stimulus presentation, orientation disparity has been known to be more discriminable than disparity in line arrangement (e.g., J. Beck, 19 72). The source of the effect and its locus were studied in 7 experiments. In different experiments a discrimination between an upright T and either a tilted T or an L, or a discrimination between a tilted T and an L, was req uired, either in a single stimulus presentation or in the context of uprigh t Ts. Number of stimuli, location uncertainty, and adjacency between stimul i were manipulated. The results indicated that the effect is insensitive to these factors, which is incommensurate with predictions from several accou nts of the effect. All the effect requires is that disparate stimuli are si multaneously presented, suggesting that relative judgment is a necessary co ndition for its manifestation. The effect surfaces when the task calls for procedures based on perception of homogeneity or salience.