Cervical lesions ave associated with human papillomavirus type 16 intratypic variants that have high transcriptional activity and increased usage of common mammalian codons

Citation
Jm. Bible et al., Cervical lesions ave associated with human papillomavirus type 16 intratypic variants that have high transcriptional activity and increased usage of common mammalian codons, J GEN VIROL, 81, 2000, pp. 1517-1527
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY
ISSN journal
00221317 → ACNP
Volume
81
Year of publication
2000
Part
6
Pages
1517 - 1527
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-1317(200006)81:<1517:CLAAWH>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) is a major cause of cervical neoplasi a, but only a minority of HPV-16 infections result in cancer. Whether parti cular HPV-16 variants are associated with cervical disease has not yet been clearly established. An investigation of whether cervical neoplasia is ass ociated with infection with HPV-16 intratypic variants was undertaken by us ing RFLP analyses in a study of 100 HPV-16 DNA-positive women with or witho ut neoplasia. RFLP variant 2 was positively associated [odds ratio (OR) = 2 .57] and variant 5 was negatively associated with disease (OR = 0.2). Varia nt 1, which resembles the reference isolate of HPV-16, was found at a simil ar prevalence among those with and without neoplasia, Variants 1 and 2 were also more likely to be associated with detectable viral mRNA than variant 5 (respectively P = 0.03 and P = 0.00). When HPV-16 E5 ORFs in 50 clones fr om 36 clinical samples were sequenced, 19 variant HPV-16 E5 DNA sequences w ere identified. Twelve of these DNA sequences encoded variant E5 amino acid sequences, 10 of which were novel. Whilst the associations between HPV-16 E5 RFLP variants and neoplasia could not be attributed to differences in am ino acid sequences, correlation was observed in codon usage. DNA sequences of RFLP variant 2 (associated with greatest OR for neoplasia) had a signifi cantly greater usage of common mammalian codons compared with RFLP pattern 1 variants.