D. Poisson et al., Protective effects of I-1-antihypertensive agent moxonidine against neurogenic cardiac arrhythmias in halothane-anesthetized rabbits, J PHARM EXP, 293(3), 2000, pp. 929-938
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Numerous studies have addressed the antihypertensive properties of I-1-imid
azoline receptor agonists such as moxonidine, but very few authors examined
their cardiac antiarrhythmic potency. Due to the important role of the sym
pathetic nervous system in the genesis of neurogenic cardiac arrhythmias, w
e investigated the antiarrhythmic effects of moxonidine and compared them t
o those of propranolol in an experimental model of neurogenic arrhythmias.
Chronic bipolar electrodes were implanted within the posterior hypothalamus
of six halothane-anesthetized rabbits. Every 15 days, after three 10-min-i
nterval control electrical stimulations, we compared the effects of randomi
zed i.v. administrations of moxonidine (25 mu g/kg), propranolol (0.5 mg/kg
), and saline (0.9% NaCl) on mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR),
and ECG during 2.5 h with six stimulations every 20 min. We observed that:
1) in control conditions, intrahypothalamic stimulation increased MAP (Del
ta MAP = 17 +/- 2 mm Hg) and HR (Delta HR = 60 +/- 1 beats/min), and trigge
red extrasystoles (number of extrasystoles = 55 +/- 2) and abnormal complex
es (number of abnormal ECG complexes = 37 +/- 1), which occurred with a 6.4
+/- 0.4-s delay and 33 +/- 1-s duration; 2) moxonidine and propranolol ind
uced almost equihypotensive (Delta MAP = -12 +/- 2 and -10 +/- 2 mm Hg) and
pronounced bradycardic effects (Delta HR = -47 +/- 10 and -78 +/- 9 beats/
min, respectively). Arrhythmias were significantly reduced by moxonidine an
d propranolol: Delta number of extrasystoles = -83 and -98%; Delta number o
f abnormal ECG complexes = -33 and -79%; Delta delay = +65 and +188%; Delta
duration = -35 and -58%, respectively. Our results show that moxonidine pr
esents an antiarrhythmic potency comparable to that of propranolol that sho
uld be predominantly related to their central action. However, additional s
tudies are required to determine whether these antiarrhythmic effects are o
f central and/or peripheral origin.