Some measure of disease severity is needed to properly compare the outcomes
of the various approaches to the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency
. Comparing the outcomes of two or more different treatments in a clinical
trial, or the same treatment in two or more reports from the literature can
not be done with confidence unless the relative severity of the venous dise
ase in each treatment group is known. The CEAP (Clinical-Etiology-Anatomic-
Pathophysiologic) system is an excellent classification scheme, but it cann
ot serve the purpose of venous severity scoring because many of its compone
nts are relatively static and others use detailed alphabetical designations
. A disease severity scoring scheme needs to be quantifiable, with gradable
elements that can change in response to treatment. However, an American Ve
nous Forum committee on venous outcomes assessment has developed a venous s
everity scoring system based on the best usable elements of the CEAP system
. Two scores are proposed. The first is a Venous Clinical Severity Score: n
ine clinical characteristics of chronic venous disease are graded from 0 to
3 (absent, mild, moderate, severe) with specific criteria to avoid overlap
or arbitrary scoring. Zero to three points are added for differences in ba
ckground conservative therapy (compression and elevation) to produce a 30 p
oint-maximum flat scale. The second is a Venous Segmental Disease Score, wh
ich combines the Anatomic and Pathophysiologic components of CEAP. Major ve
nous segments are graded according to presence of reflux and/or obstruction
. Ir is entirely based on venous imaging, primarily duplex scan but also ph
lebographic findings. This scoring scheme weights 11 venous segments for th
eir relative importance when involved with reflux and/or obstruction, with
a maximum score of 10. A third score is simply a modification of the existi
ng CEAP disability score that eliminates reference to work and an 8-hour wo
rking day, substituting instead the patient's prior normal activities. Thes
e new scoring schemes are intended to complement the current CEAP system.