Antibacterial effect of chloramphenicol, thiamphenicol and florfenicol against aquatic animal bacteria

Citation
Sp. Ho et al., Antibacterial effect of chloramphenicol, thiamphenicol and florfenicol against aquatic animal bacteria, J VET MED S, 62(5), 2000, pp. 479-485
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
09167250 → ACNP
Volume
62
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
479 - 485
Database
ISI
SICI code
0916-7250(200005)62:5<479:AEOCTA>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was measured to evaluate the ant ibacterial activities of chloramphenicol (CP), thiamphenicol (TP) and florf enicol (EFC) against the aquatic bacterial isolates from soft-shell turtles , fish and shellfish. Amoxicillin (AMPC), oxytetracycline (OTC) and oxolini c acid (OA) were included to compare with above protein synthesis inhibitor s. The results showed that the order of MIC range of the isolates From soft -shell turtles for tested drugs was OA>FFC, CP>TP>AMPC, OTC. The percentage of the resistant strains indicated that OA was the lowest (7.14%) and OTC was the highest (85.07%). The order of antibacterial activity against the i solates from fish was OA>FFC>CP >AMPC>OTC>TP. The percentage of the resista nt strains revealed that OA (13.64%) and OTC (80.91%) were the lowest and t he highest, respectively. For the isolates from shellfish, the order of ant imicrobial activity was OA>CP, FFC>AMPC, OTC, TP. TP showed the greatest pe rcentage of the resistant strains (58.7%), but that of OA was the lowest (4 .35%). The most common resistant patterns of the isolates from turtles, fis h and shellfish were AMPC-OTC, CP-TP-AMPC-OTC, and FFC-CP-TP-AMPC-OTC, resp ectively. There were partially-complete resistance of the resistant isolate s among CP, TP and FFC. The findings indicated that previous treatment migh t affect the choice of drug to use for aquatic bacterial diseases.