H. Vierheilig et al., Differences in glucosinolate patterns and arbuscular mycorrhizal status ofglucosinolate-containing plant species, NEW PHYTOL, 146(2), 2000, pp. 343-352
Under defined laboratory conditions it was shown that two glucosinolate-con
taining plant species, Tropaeolum majus and Carica papaya, were colonized b
y arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, whereas it was not possible to detect
AM fungal structures in other glucosinolate-containing plants (including se
veral Brassicaceae). Benzylglucosinolate was present in all of the T. majus
cultivars and in C. papaya it was the major glucosinolate. 2-Phenylethylgl
ucosinolate was found in most of the non-host plants tested. Its absence in
the AM host plants indicates a possible role for the isothiocyanate produc
ed from its myrosinase-catalysed hydrolysis as a general AM inhibitory fact
or in non-host plants. The results suggest that some of the indole glucosin
olates might also be involved in preventing AM formation in some of the spe
cies. In all plants tested, both AM hosts and non-hosts, the glucosinolate
pattern was altered after inoculation with one of three different AM fungi
(Glomus mosseae, Glomus intraradices and Gigaspora rosea), indicating signa
ls between AM fungi and plants even before root colonization. The glucosino
late induction was not specifically dependent on the AM fungus. A time-cour
se study in T. majus showed that glucosinolate induction was present during
all stages of mycorrhizal colonization.