C. Eiser et Jr. Eiser, Social comparisons and quality of life among survivors of childhood cancerand their mothers, PSYCHOL HEA, 15(3), 2000, pp. 435-450
Sixty-three survivors of childhood cancer (mean age 17 years), currently we
ll and off-treatment, and their mothers were interviewed individually about
their experiences and the impact of their illness on their lives. Survivor
s also completed four questionnaire measures of different aspects of qualit
y of life (perceptions of illness experience. future worries, health proble
ms and body image satisfaction), whereas mothers recorded their perceptions
of their child's quality of life on the same four scales. These scales sho
wed good internal consistency and convergent validity for both survivors an
d mothers. Mothers also completed a measure of their own quality of life (t
he SF-36). The interviews with both survivors and mothers were content-anal
ysed for statements expressing social comparisons. These statements were co
ded according to whether the comparison implied a favourable, neutral or un
favourable evaluation of the individual survivor. Mothers who made a higher
proportion of unfavourable comparisons reported worse adjustment for their
child on all four scales and described their own quality of life more nega
tively. Among survivors, those who made a higher proportion of unfavourable
comparisons gave significantly more negative self-ratings on one of the fo
ur scales. Correlations between survivors' and mothers' ratings on the four
scales were positive, but comparatively low. This reinforces concerns abou
t using parents as proxy judges of young people's quality of life, although
the correlations were more satisfactory in the case of younger rather than
older (>18.5 years) survivors. Mothers who rated their own quality of life
as less satisfactory reported more problems for their child on all four sc
ales, irrespective of how the survivors described themselves.