We consider the problem of bargaining over the disclosure of interim resear
ch knowledge between two participants in an R&D race for an ultimate, paten
table invention. Licence fee schedules that are functions of the "amount of
knowledge disclosed", by the leading to the lagging agent, are examined fo
r their abilities to attain efficient outcomes and varying shares of the su
rplus arising from disclosure. In her sequential-offers bargaining games, t
he uninformed buyer is able to elicit full disclosures without sharing the
incremental surplus with any type of the licensor, and thus do as well as a
perfectly informed and discriminating knowledge licensee.