O. Axler et al., SMALL HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECT OF TYPICAL RAPID VOLUME INFUSIONS IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS, Critical care medicine, 25(6), 1997, pp. 965-970
Objectives: To determine what volumes are commonly used for rapid volu
me infusions in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care
unit (ICU) for >12 hrs; and to determine the effective ness of a typi
cal rapid volume infusion in producing hemodynamic change and increasi
ng left ventricular end-diastolic volume. Design: A prospective survey
of clinical practice (part I)and a prospective clinical investigation
(part 2). Setting: Two hospital ICUs (11 and six beds) of which one i
s university affiliated. Patients: Critically ill patients admitted to
the ICU for >12 hrs. Interventions: Infusion of 500 mL of normal sali
ne over 5 to 10 mins. Measurements and Main Results: For 1 month, we r
ecorded the volume and composition of all volume infusions given as a
rapid bolus in patients admitted to the ICU for >12 hrs. We then measu
red the effect of the median rapid volume infusion in a subset of 13 p
atients by measuring hemodynamics (using arterial and pulmonary artery
flotation catheters) and left ventricular end-diastolic area (using t
ransgastric short-axis views from transesophageal echocardiograms). Du
ring 470 patient days, 159 rapid volume infusions were administered. T
he average rapid volume infusion administered was 390 +/- 160 mL (medi
an 500; interquartile range 250 to 500). Crystalloid solutions were us
ed for two thirds of the rapid volume infusions and colloid solutions
were used for one third of the rapid volume infusions. The rapid volum
e infusion of 500 mt of saline did not significantly increase mean art
erial pressure (78.0 +/- 11.9 to 79.3 +/- 14.6 mm Hg), cardiac index (
4.3 +/- 1.7 to 4.6 +/- 1.8 L/min/m(2)), right atrial pressure (11.1 +/
- 3.8 to 12.4 +/- 3.3 mm Hg), left ventricular end diastolic area (8.6
+/- 1.7 to 9.1 +/- 1.8 cm(2)/m(2)), or left ventricular end-systolic
area (3.5 +/- 1.5 to 3.6 +/- 1.5 cm(2)/m(2)). Pulmonary artery occlusi
on pressure increased slightly but significantly from 12.9 +/- 3.4 to
14.7 +/- 3.3 mm Hg (p < .05). Conclusions: After patients are admitted
to the ICU for >12 hrs, rapid volume infusions are common therapeutic
interventions but the rapid volume infusions are typically small. The
effect of a typical rapid volume infusion on hemodynamics and left ve
ntricular areas in these patients is surprisingly small.