Continent urinary reconstruction versus ileal conduit: A contemporary single-institution comparison of perioperative morbidity and mortality

Citation
Dj. Parekh et al., Continent urinary reconstruction versus ileal conduit: A contemporary single-institution comparison of perioperative morbidity and mortality, UROLOGY, 55(6), 2000, pp. 852-855
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
UROLOGY
ISSN journal
00904295 → ACNP
Volume
55
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
852 - 855
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-4295(200006)55:6<852:CURVIC>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Objectives. To compare postoperative morbidity and mortality in a concurren t and contemporary series of patients who underwent radical cystectomy with ileal conduit versus orthotopic neobladder. Methods. The data of 198 patients were reviewed, 117 with orthotopic recons truction and 81 with ileal conduit during a 5-year time frame. Thirty-day m orbidity, mortality, reoperative rates, and parameters associated with the surgical procedures were obtained from chart review. Results. No perioperative or postoperative deaths occurred in either group. The median operative time for the ileal conduit was 201 minutes (range 140 to 373), and for the orthotopic neobladder, it was 270 minutes (range 230 to 425). The median blood loss was 389 and 474 mL, respectively. The median length of hospitalization was 8 days for the ileal conduit group and 7 day s for the orthotopic neobladder group. Diversion-related complications reco gnized within 30 days that ultimately required a return to the operating ro om occurred in 3.4% of those with a neobladder and 1.2% of those with an il eal conduit. Conclusions. The orthotopic neobladder is a longer and technically more com plex procedure than the ileal conduit procedure. However, no demonstrable d ifference in morbidity or perioperative complications were found between th e two procedures in our review. UROLOGY 55: 852-855, 2000. (C) 2000, Elsevi er Science Inc.