In order to find how best to diagnose amyloid deposits as early as possible
, the sensitivity of three different methods that can be applied to the dia
gnosis of amyloid in tissue sections have been compared: the Congo red stai
ning method (CR), the combination of CR and immunocytochemistry (CRIC) and
Congo red fluorescence (CRF). Tissue blocks were available from 25 patients
, including 11 with immunohistochemically distinct and 3 with chemically un
defined amyloid diseases. The results revealed (a) that CRF is more sensiti
ve than either CR or CRIC, as shown qualitatively and quantitatively, (b) t
hat CRF can therefore be utilized to track down even minute amyloid deposit
s, which can be missed by the other two methods; (c) that the specificity o
f CRF and CRIC is secured on double-stained sections by the demonstration o
f green birefringence (GB) of the CRF-marked and IC-marked areas; (d) that
CRF can be performed on the spot by just changing the light source; and (e)
that CRF is ndt hampered by the congruent IC chromogen overlay, which ensu
res the specific classification of the amyloid deposits as applied to diffe
rent amyloid classes. In conclusion, CRF was demonstrated to be the most se
nsitive method for direct diagnosis of amyloid in tissue sections. This met
hod can, therefore, allow the earliest diagnosis and classification of amyl
oid, which is a good basis for an amyloid class-specific therapy while orga
n damage is still minimal.