After a retrospect on the publication of Gregor Mendel's paper and on
the circumstances of its rediscovery, the discussion of Mendel's ''too
close'' results is revisited. Evidence from computer simulations is p
resented, which suggests that the segregation ratio reported by Mendel
for experiment 2 is highly credible. The retrospect closes with a gla
nce on interpreting Mendel's work as being opposed to Darwinism. In a
section on molecular genetics, recent results on the wrinkled seed cha
racter of pea are discussed. It has been shown that the wrinkled seed
phenotype described by Mendel is due to an insertion of a transposable
element into a gene coding for starch-branching. Finally, the possibi
lity of dissecting quantitative characters into distinct Mendelian fac
tors using molecular markers is considered. Mapping of quantitative tr
ait loci has solved the old struggle between Mendelian and quantitativ
e genetics and is of considerable interest for selection of characters
with low heritability in practical plant breeding.