Sonography for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases among patients with tongue cancer: Criteria for early detection and assessment of follow-up examination intervals
K. Yuasa et al., Sonography for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases among patients with tongue cancer: Criteria for early detection and assessment of follow-up examination intervals, AM J NEUROR, 21(6), 2000, pp. 1127-1132
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Neurosciences & Behavoir
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Because the presence of cervical metastasis is one
of the factors influencing the outcome of patients with carcinoma of the he
ad and neck, its early detection is potentially very important. The purpose
of this study was to evaluate the characteristic changes of cervical metas
tasis revealed by sonography during follow-up and to assess an adequate int
erval for follow-up sonography of the neck among patients with tongue cance
r,
METHODS: Forty-three of 44 consecutive patients with squamous cell carcinom
a of the tongue, who had undergone interstitial brachytherapy, were examine
d with sonography of the neck during the posttherapeutic follow-up period.
RESULTS: Seventeen cervical lymph node metastases were found in 12 of 43 pa
tients during follow-up. Of these 17 cervical metastases, 16 (94.1%) were a
ccurately diagnosed and one (5.9%) was misdiagnosed as nonmetastatic based
on sonographic findings, Sonography of the neck performed in seven patients
at an interval of less than 1 month since the last follow-up imaging showe
d 9 (90.0%) of 10 metastases increased by up to 2 mm in short-axis diameter
. Five patients who were followed up at an interval of more than 1 month si
nce the last followup imaging had seven metastases increase by 3 to 8 mm in
short-axis diameter or a change of echogenicity in the internal structure
of lymph nodes or both. Pathologic examinations showed extranodal spread in
3 (42.9%) of these 7 metastases.
CONCLUSION: Changes both in size and internal echogenicity can occur as qui
ckly as 2 to 4 weeks between sonographic examinations. Therefore, in high-r
isk patients, or in those with suspicious sonographic findings, short-inter
val follow-up sonographic examinations are recommended at least during the
first posttherapeutic year. Our findings suggest that follow-up sonography
of the neck should be performed monthly, at least during the first postther
apeutic year.