As. Mclean et al., ESTIMATION OF CARDIAC-OUTPUT BY NONINVASIVE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES IN THE CRITICALLY-ILL SUBJECT, Anaesthesia and intensive care, 25(3), 1997, pp. 250-254
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology,"Emergency Medicine & Critical Care
We evaluated the accuracy of cardiac output estimations by three trans
thoracic echocardiography techniques in critically ill subjects. This
study was a prospective comparison study carried out in a general inte
nsive care unit of a teaching hospital. The subjects had a broad range
of diagnoses including pulmonary embolus, cardiogenic shock, septic s
hock, Legionnaire's disease and perioperative myocardial infarction. A
ll patients requiring pulmonary artery catheterization underwent echoc
ardiographic cardiac assessment with comparison of findings to those o
btained by thermodilution techniques. Nineteen studies on eighteen pat
ients were performed, with cardiac output calculated by the two-chambe
r Simpson's, four-chamber Simpson's, and left ventricular outflow trac
t (LVOT) Doppler methods. Acceptable data was obtained in those patien
ts without mitral regurgitation. There was good correlation between th
e thermodilution technique and Simpson's two-chamber method (r = 0.91)
, but less so with the Simpson's four-chamber method (r = 0.77). All s
tudies were included in the LVOT Doppler method with a good correlatio
n (r = 0.94). A plot of differences between methods using the Bland an
d Altman statistical method indicated that only the LVOT Doppler metho
d demonstrated acceptable agreement with a mean of 0.2 litres/minute,
standard deviation of 0.82 litres/minute and 95% limits of agreement o
f -1.5 to +1.9 litres/minute. We conclude that the LVOT Doppler method
was the only one which demonstrated acceptable agreement between the
thermodilution method and echocardiographic techniques in all critical
ly ill patients studied.