In the late 1960s, states began to liberalize their abortion laws, and a ne
w era in women's health began. Under the leadership of Jack Smith, the Cent
ers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established a voluntary aborti
on surveillance system that provided the first nationwide information on th
e numbers and characteristics of women having abortions. Studies of abortio
n morbidity done by the CDC revealed that suction curettage was safer than
sharp curettage, local anesthesia was safer than general anesthesia, free-s
tanding clinics were safer than hospitals, and dilation and evacuation (D&E
) was safer than the alternative of labor induction for early second-trimes
ter abortions. This evidence, which contradicted traditional medical tenets
, rapidly changed the practice of abortion in the United States. CDC also e
stablished a surveillance system for abortion deaths. This demonstrated a r
apid improvement in die safety of abortion in the early 1970s. Lessons lear
ned from mortality investigations helped to change practice as well. Today,
more is known about the epidemiology of abortion than any other operation
in the history of medicine. In the midst of strident debate over the aborti
on issue, CDC abortion surveillance data have helped to guide judicial ruli
ngs, legislative actions, and Surgeon General's reports, which have support
ed safer choices for women of reproductive age. When medical historians of
the future look back on this century, the increasing availability of safe,
legal abortion will stand out as a public health triumph.