Bmg. Pena et Ga. Taylor, Radiologists' confidence in interpretation of sonography and CT in suspected pediatric appendicitis, AM J ROENTG, 175(1), 2000, pp. 71-74
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
OBJECTIVE. We sought to determine radiologists' confidence in interpretatio
n of sonography and CT performed using rectal contrast material for diagnos
ing pediatric appendicitis.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We prospectively examined 139 children and young adul
ts with equivocal clinical findings for appendicitis who were seen in the e
mergency department of an urban pediatric teaching hospital between July an
d December, 1998, Patients were initially examined with pelvic sonography.
If the sonographic results were equivocal or if the appendix was not visual
ized, CT was performed. Radiologists recorded their level of confidence in
interpretation of the sonograms and CT examinations.
RESULTS. Sonography was interpreted with very low, low, or medium confidenc
e in 59 (42.4%) of 139 patients and width high or very high confidence in 8
0 (57.6%) of 139, CT was interpreted with very low, low, or medium confiden
ce in nine (8.3%) of 108 and with high or very high confidence in 99 (91.7%
) of 108 children. Radiologists were more confident in their interpretation
of CT than sonography (p < 0.001), If the sonography was a true-positive e
xamination, radiologists were more confident in its interpretation than if
it was a false-positive study (P = 0,003). Radiologists were more confident
in sonographic interpretation of a true-negative examination than of a fal
se-negative study (p = 0,03). Patient age and sex and the radiologists' lev
el of experience did not make a significant difference in the confidence of
interpretation of sonography or CT.
CONCLUSION.. In the evaluation of childhood appendicitis, radiologists' con
fidence in interpretation is influenced by the choice of imaging technique
as well as by the results of the study.