The evaluation of regional myocardial blood flow (RMBF) during cardiac cath
eterization is of particular diagnostic interest. The purpose of this inves
tigation was to validate x-ray densitometric parameters for the evaluation
of RMBF.
In five anesthetized dogs, arterial flow in the circumflex coronary artery
was measured continuously with an electromagnetic flowmeter, and RMBF was d
etermined by colored microspheres. Five different perfusion levels were cre
ated by mechanical obstruction of the coronary artery or by intravenous inf
usion of adenosine. At each steady-state perfusion level, digital subtracti
on coronary angiograms were obtained for densitometric analysis.
Results documented a close correlation between the related time parameters
1/Mean Transit Time (1/MTT, r(2) = 0.969), and 1/Rise Time (1/RT, r(2) = 0.
965) and RMBF over a wide range between 0.36 ml/(min . g) and 11.16 ml/(min
. g). Maximum myocardial contrast density (Imax) also showed a good, but i
nverse correlation (r(2) = 0.889) with RMBF and, therefore, did not reflect
vascular volume. Contrast medium Appearance Time (AT) showed no correlatio
n to RMBF (r(2) = 0.017). Repeat densitometric measurements for different p
erfusion levels revealed a good reproducibility for MTT (accuracy: 0.001 s;
precision: 0.447 s or 6.7%) and RT (accuracy: 0.014 s; precision: 0.202 s
or 10.4%), while AT (accuracy: 0.072 s; precision: 0.420 s or 68.5%) and Im
ax (accuracy: 0.022 GL; precision: 1.197 GL or 44.5%) showed substantial va
riation. Myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) calculated from RT (r(2) = 0.90
) or MTT (r(2) = 0.94) showed better correlations to RMBF reserve than MPR
calculated from AT (r(2) = 0.04).
In conclusion, only 1/MTT and 1/RT showed a good reproducibility and a clos
e correlation to RMBF Therefore, only these parameters can be recommended f
or calculations of RMBF and its reserve under clinical conditions.