Structural and functional characterizations of the 5 '-flanking region of the mouse glucagon receptor gene: Comparison with the rat gene

Citation
A. Geiger et al., Structural and functional characterizations of the 5 '-flanking region of the mouse glucagon receptor gene: Comparison with the rat gene, BIOC BIOP R, 272(3), 2000, pp. 912-921
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Biochemistry & Biophysics
Journal title
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN journal
0006291X → ACNP
Volume
272
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
912 - 921
Database
ISI
SICI code
0006-291X(20000616)272:3<912:SAFCOT>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
A putative proximal promoter was defined previously for the mouse glucagon receptor (GR) gene. In the present study, a distal promoter was characteriz ed upstream from a novel non-coding exon revealed by the 5'-rapid amplifica tion of cDNA ends from mouse liver tissue. The 5'-flanking region of the mo use GR gene was cloned up to 6 kb and the structural organization was compa red to the 5' untranslated region of the rat gene cloned up to 7 kb. The no vel exon, separated by an intron of 3.8 kb from the first coding exon, disp layed a high homology (80%) with the most distal of the two untranslated ex ons found in the 5' region of the rat GR gene. The mouse distal promoter re gion, extending up to -1 kb from the novel exon, displayed 85% identity wit h the rat promoter. Both contain a highly GC-rich sequence with five putati ve binding sites for Sp1, but no consensus TATA or CAAT elements. To evalua te basal promoter activities, 5'-flanking sequences of mouse or rat GR gene s were fused to a luciferase reporter gene and transiently expressed in a m ouse and in a rat cell line, respectively or in rat hepatocytes. Both mouse and rat distal promoter regions directed a high level of reporter gene act ivity. Deletion of the Spl binding sites region or mutation of the second p roximal Spl sequence markedly reduced the distal promoter activity of the r eporter gene. The mouse proximal promoter activity was 2- to 3-fold less th an the distal promoter, for which no functional counterpart was observed in the similar region of the rat gem. (C) 2000 Academic Press.