Background: Midwives tend to leave minor perineal lacerations to heal spont
aneously, and clinical experience and studies show that women can suffer fr
om their stitched lacerations. The study purpose was to determine any diffe
rences in the healing process and experience of minor perineal lacerations
when they were sutured or not sutured. Methods: Eighty term pregnant primip
aras with minor perineal lacerations of grades I-ii were randomized after c
hildbirth. The experimental group was nonsutured and the control group was
sutured. A follow-up examination was performed at 2 to 3 days, 8 weeks, and
6 months after the delivery. Participants were asked about the type of dis
comfort, and the effect of the laceration on breastfeeding and sexual inter
course. Results: No significant differences were found in the healing proce
ss. The type of pain differed between the groups, but the amount of discomf
ort was the same. The sutured group had to visit the midwife more often bec
ause of discomfort from the stitches. Sixteen percent of the women in the s
utured group, but none in the nonsutured group (p = 0.0385), considered tha
t the laceration had had a negative influence on breastfeeding. Conclusions
: Minor perineal lacerations can be left to heal spontaneously. The benefit
s for the woman include the possibility of having a choice, avoiding the di
scomfort of anesthesia and suturing, providing positive affects on breastfe
eding.