Objective. To evaluate rite quality of patient information about emergency
contraception on the Internet.
Design. We performed an on-line search of the Internet and found relevant W
orld Wide Web sites by combining the key phrases 'emergency contraception'
and 'patient information' in two Web subject guides and two search engines.
We defined quality as the extent to which the characteristics of a Web sit
e satisfied its stated and implied objectives. Our assessment focused on cr
edibility and content of each Web site. Credibility was assessed by source.
currency and editorial review process and content of Web sire was assessed
by hierarchy and accuracy of evidence.
Results. Our search revealed 32 relevant Web sites, none of which complied
with all of the criteria for quality of credibility and content. Twenty-eig
ht Web sites displayed the source clearly, 17 Web sites showed currency, an
d none of the Web sires had an editorial review process. Only six of the 32
sites mentioned hierarchy of evidence. None of the Web sites depicted all
the criteria for accuracy of contents.
Conclusion. None of the Web sites provided complete information to patients
about emergency contraception according to the quality criteria used in th
is study As previous studies have shown, people need to be wary about the q
uality of information on the Internet.